.

Candidate Spotlight: Richard Evans [VIDEO]

Richard Evans is the candidate for Patchogue Village Mayor on the Progress For All slate.

With the Patchogue Village Mayoral Election coming up on March 20, Patchogue Patch has sat down with all of the candidates for Q&A and for a quick video pitch on why you should vote for them. Check back to Patchogue Patch next week for spotlights on the trustee candidates from Patchogue 2012 and Residents First.

Richard Evans

Candidate: Mayor

Party: Progress For All

Patch: Why have you decided to seek office and what makes you qualified to serve as a trustee/mayor?

Evans: I decided to seek the office of Mayor for a number of reasons. The Village of Patchogue is my home, where I planted my roots and where I will raise my family. After seeing Patchogue’s political climate and noticing a local government split down the middle I decided to get involved. I felt that we, the residents, no longer have a government or a candidate that represent us. The political ambitions and personal agendas have begun to take precedence over the needs of our community. As mayor, I will owe no favors to any organizations, corporations, donors or other elected officials. As a small business owner, I have first-hand knowledge of the economic challenges that we face as a community. My ideas and vision will create an environment to motivate investment and small business.

Patch: What are your thoughts on Patchogue's growth over the past five years?

Evans: Patchogue has seen improvements over the last five years; however on one hand we have seen investments by large development corporations, yet on the other hand we seem to have forgotten about small business development. Small business is the foundation of our local economy and must not be overlooked in the interest of large business. Not enough has been done in the last five years to fill the vacant store fronts.

Patch: What are the two biggest issues Patchogue still faces?

Evans: The two biggest issues that Patchogue still faces are the local economy and our current political environment. Patchogue needs to put forth a plan that will attract new business while also stimulating existing small businesses. We need local jobs created and tax revenue generated by creating a strong incentive program motivating new business investments. The existing government and current candidates are more interested in personal and political agendas rather than the future of Patchogue. We need a government that will work together in a common vision rather than be separated by political parties.

Patch: Are you for or against project and why?

Evans: Development of the Four Corners is necessary. I would have rather seen a plan with commercial/retail being the forefront of the project. This location needs to be the cornerstone of our business district and should be a destination for residents and visitors to come for commerce. We need to take advantage of our infrastructure (water ways, railways, highway, and local airports) and we need to start building an economy around them. Furthermore, I would have explored the possibility of Tritec making an investment into a small business fund. The fund can be setup as a low interest loan, no interest loan or in a grant form. In a time where business financing capital is low and hard to come by, we need to give people an opportunity to open a business locally, here in Patchogue. We need to focus on jobs and the local economy.

Patch: What kind of time commitment would you be able to put toward the mayor/trustee position?

Evans: I will be a full time Mayor.

Patch: In what ways would you reach out to Patchogue's large Hispanic community?

Evans: Hispanics are a part of America’s story. They have put their blood, sweat and tears into raising our nation. We need to have the Hispanic community involved in our Village. We need to directly communicate with the Hispanic community as they are integral in the fabric and success of Patchogue, from registering more Hispanics to vote, to having more Hispanic-owned businesses. As a Mayor, I will make sure their civil liberties are protected equally.

Patch: What's your goal for the makeup of Patchogue's Main Street at the end of the next four years?

Evans: Main Street needs to be full of vibrant store fronts. It has to be a place where people, not only from within our community but also from outside of the Village, come and spend their time and money. We have to make Main Street not only as the center of our Village but also a destination.

Patch: There are many vacancies on Main Street; how would you propose enticing new businesses to open up in Patchogue?

Evans: Setting up a Patchogue small business fund that will provide startup capital and support for small business investments in our Village will be a great way of enticing new businesses. Creating a more user friendly website that will easily link with our businesses with potential customers. Set up an aggressive advertising campaign with our local businesses promoting people to come to Patchogue. Streamline the process of opening a business quicker. Give economic incentives to potential business owners. We need to run a government that works hand and hand with small businesses.

Patch: What are three of your hobbies?

Evans: Some of my hobbies are reading, spending time with family and friends and woodworking.

Patch: How would your best friends/family describe you?

Evans: I would be described as someone that has empathy and is passionate about their beliefs. A hard worker that knows what it takes to get a job completed.

RELATED:

RELATED:

Check back next week for Candidate Spotlight profiles with trustee candidates from Patchogue 2012 and Residents First.

Elizabeth K March 10, 2012 at 01:20 PM
What buisness do you own?
Hank The Tank March 10, 2012 at 05:17 PM
Chris, not for nothing, but you have proven that you're not really for the "free market" either. Whether you agree with their plan or not, Tritec is a private property owner who sought for and was granted approval to develop their land. You are supporting candidates who have no respect for the liberties and private property rights of individuals and groups of individuals. They want THEIR vision (whatever that may be) on Main Street and have no regard for the rights of others. Don't we call that fascism? Look, Tritec's plan might not be the plan that you would like to see, but then again, you don't own the property and you haven't applied for or were granted permits to do anything with it. It's pretty black and white. You can talk about individual liberty all you want, but the fact remains that your actions speak louder than any words you may post on this site or any other.
Chris Barcelo March 10, 2012 at 05:32 PM
There are so many dangerous things about what is being said I will have to make a list. Look for it on local voices. To make things fair I will objectively and scientifically review the rhetoric by all the candidates when up and post for theirs as well. Only substance and principle should guide a platform where people are trusting you with their vote. You have to remember that each vote is a signal of power. It is your means to be heard and to change. If some one promises you something and then doesn't deliver they have decieved and stolen such from you. It's like at the store. When you purchase something for an agreed price you have to ensure you are getting your monies worth. Unfortunately in politics there are no returns.
Chris Barcelo March 10, 2012 at 05:40 PM
You are not taking into account one thing. Tritec has proposed the plan and got approval on grounds of a different plan. Revisions should be handled accordingly as well. I have advocated for their rights even against mister evans if you read past posts. I believe they have ALL rights as a property holder. This is why when Mr. Evans said that he will get storefronts I asked him how besides force would he do this. No answer. So in response Tritec needed approval from the people through local government to build on the scale that they were seeking, even home owners need to do so and follow code etc., so when changes to that plan are made they should be approved as well. Tritecs plan does not affect solely it's property but that of the whole village so therefore it is a community matter. If Tritec were the only affected then I would be in complete and utter agreement. But there is parking etc. that falls on the shoulders of the village and on those grounds we have rights. I do not advocate anarchy, rather limited government that seeks to not only protect one property holder but all. Individual liberty itself has very little to do with this matter in particular.
Chris Barcelo March 10, 2012 at 05:44 PM
Before you counter with this, I know local government had passed it. With a majority decision after the Maror's vote was cast. Everything is being done to address this that can legally be done. The only other way is for the community to take back their voice and get some one in there who can call for another formal vote on the matter. Either way however, apartments or not, it is bigger then that. Patchogue needs to return to a local government that listens to it's people and doesn't just decide things for them. That is my largest point. The apartments are being handled by the powers that can decide such things and our role now should be to make sure that we are heard. That is my biggest problem with Mr. Evans. He promises these things yet I don't think he is listening nor knows what we want. He just knows how to say 'nice things' and blow hot air.
keith philip March 10, 2012 at 10:41 PM
Chris, I think you need to look at Richard Evans' new post: Village Government Representing the People. By the way, Mr. Evans never suggested or, I think, would he ever exercise eminent domain or use government power to take away any property. What's dangerous are your unfounded innuendos and accusations. You say that you will fairly and scientifically review all the candidates, but so far you've only disparaged and taken out of context (in a dedicated blog post) one candidate. So my question is, who are you working for? What is your goal here? Your arguments are baseless and weak. Perhaps your time would be better spent looking into Agenda 21 or the NDAA. Mr. Evans spoke at the NU Village elections rally today, the only one who made time of the three candidates, and it was a positive message of liberty and forward-thinking vision for the Village and our country.
Chris Barcelo March 10, 2012 at 10:57 PM
Whome I work for is myself. I understand your frustrations and your misinterpretation of me making an accustation, pardon the ryhme, but I have never made any such that he would do that. I merely begged an answer to the question of how he would go about bringing storefronts to the four corners when he was alluded to in previous statements (http://patchogue.patch.com/blog_posts/richard-evans-four-corners) when tritec was the property owner. Also I have stated on Patch before the following: "I also don't want it to be assumed that his plans include violating the rights of the property owner as this was never stated from the candidate nor their campaign. I just don't see any other way of going about it within the vision he alludes to. I will be happy to hear if I am wrong in this but being that there is such a lack of correspondence, you can't even leave a comment on his facebook page, it is quite hard. " as well as condemned a comment that Mr. Evans was working with Patchogue 2012. While I do appreciate the fact that you have an opinion this type of argument should not be the reasoning in which the future of the village is entrusted. A candidate showing up and speaking by no means constitutes value in his words. We need to put the social arguments and read between the lines this election.
Chris Barcelo March 10, 2012 at 10:57 PM
PESKY E.....

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something